Archive | Kurt Stevens RSS feed for this section

Tormented Talent – KURTSTEVENS

3 Sep

F/3f; year: 1985; time: 55 minutes

Another simple film by this producer with no pretense whatsoever that the set is anything other than a cheap motel room. It is the “talent office” of a “producer.” The male producer and his female assistant ‘Pat’ discuss the day’s schedule, which will be the ‘interview,’ if you will, od three aspiring actresses. Pat asks: “How long can we get away with this?” The sleazy producer gives vague assurances. We are about to find out what they are up to.

‘Maria,’ a brunette in a legitimate two-piece suit and silk blouse, dressed for a serious interview, is first to arrive. She claims experience but is vague and has no portfolio. Pat explains that this will be a “fetish” movie, and that “fetish” means spanking. Since there is no evidence of experience, Pat wants an audition. Maria is pretty enough, but poor camera angles have hidden her face until this closeup when she realizes she must take a spanking then and there.

Off with the jacket. Maria feigns another shock when Pat takes a small hairbrush and a little paddle from a desk drawer. OTK, skirt up, to display frilly thong-like panties, garter belt, and stockings. “My God,” exclaims Pat, “you certainly have dressed for the part.” The handspanking, paddling, and hairbrushing are trivial and boring, but Maria has a quality, entertaining tush and it has been fun to watch the girl be maneuvered into this circumstance. Skirt off, back OTK, wispy panties down. Silk blouse off, bent over the desk for more silly spanking but a good closeup. Interview over. “We’ll call you.” Not.

Second into the crucible, which we see is a second floor motel room with an outside entrance, is ‘Brandi Coldwater.’ “You’re late.” “I couldn’t find your office.” She is a frizzy helter-skelter brunette and once again poor camera work fails to catch her face. We go through the fetish/spanking explanation. This dolly does a cute acting job in confusing “fetish” to mean an hors d’oeuvre. She should be getting what is going on here–SHE is the hors d’oeuvre. OTK, up with the pink flower-print dress, nice red transparent string bikini stretched over a bottom which surely pleased the casting director. Up on a chair, pants off, nice winks. A bit of the diaper position on the chair, we finally see her sweet charming face–no reason to have waited this long. She’s done. “Do I get the part?”

And last is ‘Nicky,’ a delectable youthful reddish blonde, who completely undresses immediately, even bare feet, and puts pretty sky blue silk panties Pat has at her elbow and hands her. Nice trim youthful natural body. This is a spanking we are eager to see. OTK, panties bunched. When the panties are pulled off, they puddle sweetly on the floor. Nicky struggles naked on Pat’s lap, bottom high, feet kicking. Over the desk, nice winks in an extreme closeup. The crew knows Nicky is the star of the show. Lovely facials too, and sooner this time. Finally: “Is this enough?” Guess so; she hears while she is standing naked, rubbing her bottom: “We’ll be calling you tomorrow.”

It seems the producer has been watching through a hidden camera, explaining the central placement and posing action. He returns, they are amused at the day’s catch, and he proceeds to fire Pat, having presumably gotten his rocks off and now access to the little morsel Nicky on the morrow.

Behind in the Rent – KURTSTEVENS

10 Jun

M/2f; year: 1990; time: 36 minutes

Young appealing girls cannot pay the rent–ahh, an abundant plotline for all the producers in the idiom. This film is mild, but the girls are lovely, and probably have other jobs as actresses, so their assets are preserved. Two sweet-looking brunettes sleep peacefully in their apartment. The phone rings; ‘Julie’ wakes and answers. The landlord, a smarmy-looking guy with full rabbinical beard, wants three months’ back rent. Julue strips off her nightie and dresses for work in very naughty attire; we get a slow reverse striptease from total nudity–lovely, unshaven bush, nifty bikini tan lines circa 1990, hard bottom, perfect breasts. She is comfortable naked. This film may have been released also as “Correction of Julie.”

Julie leaves for work but is jumped by a guy hidden in the back seat of her car–it is the landlord’s son. She is dragged back inside. The bearded landlord has appeared on the scene too. Time for some action with delectable young lady. Julie demands to know what is going on. It’s about the rent, my dear, the rent. “Wait a minute…you’re not going to take this out in trade, are you?” Not exactly, Miss Julie. She is shocked to hear that spanking is the agenda this morning. She is wrestled OTK for a long mildly productive handspanking. The sexy tussle is reminiscent of ShadowLane romantic work. The pretty, reluctant bottom makes up for the mild chastisement. She loses her panties and her slip slides down, so we get the full view.

The second sleeping actress has been hugging here teddy bear and somehow didn’t hear the tremendous squawk and flesh-on-flesh in the living room. She too strips and slowly dresses, giving us another leisurely panoramic view. She discovers the strangers in the living room; Julie explains that a spanking is the order of the day, this aspiring actress endures the same wrestling OTK spanking.

At the conclusion, the landlord speaks to his agent on the phone and accepts a new rental–to two more actresses! Yes, he acknowledges, actresses are unreliable payers.

Family Matters – KURT STEVENS

1 Jun

M/f; year: 2004; time: 45 minutes

Kurt Stevens himself plays an authentic-looking ‘uncle’ who is going to lay down the law for his college-girl niece, Sarah, played skillfully by an innocent-enough blonde, who is impudently resistant to being punished but equally mindful she is in acadmeic and financial trouble as she parties through college.

Uncle brings her to a m0tel room, a theme we’ve seen several times in our limited Kurt Stevens experience. The suggestion of such an illicit setting enhances the naughty inappropriateness of the blackmail spanking Stevens will perform. He has spent $25,000 on her, she’s a ‘little princess.’ “I think you need a lot of discipline….” Sarah flips her hair and shrugs with her teenage disdain at her predicament, increasing the tension for what surely is coming.

He is going to withdraw his support, unless of course…”I think you need to deal with the consequences…a damn good spankkng.” Sarah is appropriately shocked in a facial closeup. “You can’t be serious.” Accusatory camera angles make you eager for him to get to work on her. She sits and stews, camera holding¬† on her face, given time to think it over, then accepts. She wants to keep her car, her life. A little skin off her bottom might not be too bad.

She is sent to the bedroom in this ‘motel’ suite. “Go to the next room and take off your top and jeans.”¬† When Uncle enters, Sarah has stripped to girlish innocent white bra and panties and is submissive. OTK on the bed, Uncle quickly strips her panties down to her ankles. Very sweet package, all the more erotic on the motel bed. She squeaks at his strokes and kicks her bare feet.

They stop then reposition and start again. What happened in the sequence? His gentle slapping start has begun to escalate. She now yelps. “You’re starting to get nice and warm [in his Philadelphia accent].” And red too, we would point out.

Panties all the way off. Bottom full-screen. Very sexy for us at this point.

Next position. On the bed, pillows under hips. Sarah transitions, keeps her front covered and her bra still on. He begins with a paddle and flicks the snap on her bra, which slips free as she surges. When Sarah tells her friends about this filming, she will remember the paddle.

Another position, bent over the motel desk chair, legs straight, for the completion of the paddling. At the conclusion she sits naked and contrite on the motel bed, just the slightest glimpse of her charms. You can’t help hoping she will need a reminder at the end of next semester.

\